The Animator

This is gonna take a long time to finish

So it starts off with Starry accusing Weasel of fridge theft and not being her lawyer for some other reason. The lawyer thing is irrelevant.

i just got a judge case ad after seeing this

Starry “attempts” to sue Weasel with “attempted” murder but what she should have sued him for was theft. This leads to Weasel saying she could have gone to some other place to good food or a new fridge. Starry says she is poor, Weasel suggests hunting/gardening, Starry says she is stupid, and this leads to some other events almost unrelated to this case.

Weasel asks why Starry is poor afterwards, and Starry says she has lost her job and her money because her daughter committed arson. Weasel said you don’t sue for committing a crime, so I am guessing this was a criminal case and not a civil one. I am not sure though.

Starry says her child did the arson thing by accident, but this should be settled in a different case (Starry V. [insert name of former workplace]).

Weasel steers this case back in the right direction, saying it was robbery instead of attempted murder. This is when I came in making a joke about SCOTUS and trying to help with the case. I find Weasel guilty of theft and Starry’s daughter guilty of arson, but the case goes on after I leave. Onyx acts as Weasel’s attorney while Starry defends herself using an alt.

The case goes on until Weasel pulls out his best card, saying he can sue Starry for false accusations. Starry has nothing to say to this and accepts defeat as she crumples from emotional distress. In the case of Weasel V. Starry, it looks like Weasel has won.

If this were to go down properly, they would have been put in front of a jury to discuss THE IMPORTANT parts of the case. The jury may likely find Weasel guilty of theft without all of the talk about irrelevant stuff, but this didn’t happen. None of this did.